June 14, 2009
“Put simply, in order for ‘design thinking’ to be effective (i.e. make the transition from abstract theory or philosophy to a meaningful process of adding value), it has to be applied or limited to a specific relevant context. This might sound incredibly obvious, but my own experience and some of the intellectual discussions recently in the blogosphere indicate that a lot of designers are reluctant to pragmatically constrain the scope or ambition of their thinking. It is this reluctance and the spiraling intellectual gymnastics that follow that leads to ‘design thinking’ becoming esoteric or sounding overly ‘expert’ to novices or non-designers.
Design comes from the latin word ‘designato’—‘to mark out’, thus marking out the boundary or scope of a design problem. To focus creativity has always been a fundamental part of ‘design thinking’ or the design process, perhaps even the fundamental part.
Continued reflection and discussion on the design process and its terminology is particularly important in a new discipline such as service design, however, when it comes to engaging others we also have to contextualise how our ‘design thinking’ is actually going to make things better for people.”
Fergus Bisset, Design Researcher
Support Design Feast via Patreon
This self-made project and its related efforts constitute a gracious obsession. The intention is to give a wholehearted and timely serving—as much as possible—of creative culture. If you gain a level of motivation, knowledge, even delight, from the hundreds of interviews plus write-ups here at Design Feast, and are able to contribute, please become a Patron with a recurring monthly donation. Thank you for your consideration!
Stay healthy and keep creating throughout the year!
Wishing you much success,
Nate Burgos, Content Creator & Publisher